What Really Happened in Nepal's UFO Record?

Introduction

The useful way to read Nepal’s UFO history is therefore not as a catalogue of confirmed exotic craft. It is a case study in how difficult aerial events become “UFOs” when they occur over mountains, borderlands and thinly documented rural regions. Some claims remain unresolved because physical evidence is missing; others are probably misidentified astronomical or human-made objects; and a few modern database entries are simply low-evidence witness reports with no independent corroboration. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience UAP FAQsScience UAP FAQs [CNEOS]cneos.jpl.nasa.govCNEOSFireballs and bolidesCNEOSFireballs and bolides

Why Nepal’s UFO record is concentrated in a few places

Nepal’s reported UFO material is not evenly distributed across the country. The strongest historical cluster sits along the Himalayan arc and the northern border zone, especially the 1968 reports involving north-eastern Nepal, Kaski and the wider Himalayan region from Ladakh to Bhutan. That geography matters because high-altitude terrain, sparse observation networks, Cold War military interest and cross-border flight paths all complicate identification. [The Himalayan Times]thehimalayantimes.comThe Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 yearsThe Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 years

Pokhara and Kaski dominate the national memory because the 25 March 1968 incident combined three features that most UFO claims lack: multiple local recollections, an alleged physical fall, and inclusion in declassified intelligence reporting. The Kathmandu Valley appears more often in modern public-reporting databases, but those entries tend to be single-witness sightings of lights, flashes or “saucer-like” objects rather than investigated cases. NUFORC, the United States-based National UFO Reporting Center, lists 11 reports under Nepal, illustrating that the open public archive is very small for a country of Nepal’s size. [NUFORC]nuforc.orgOpen source on nuforc.org. [NUFORC]nuforc.orgOpen source on nuforc.org. [NUFORC]nuforc.orgOpen source on nuforc.org.

This creates a sharp evidence split. Western Nepal and the Pokhara area supply the most discussed historical case. Kathmandu supplies scattered modern light-in-the-sky reports. The Tarai and border belt enter the record mainly through newer drone-like or satellite-like observations, including a 2025 India-Nepal border alert in which security personnel reported luminous objects and speculation quickly turned to drones or a possible Starlink satellite train. [Nepali Times]nepalitimes.comufo over pokharaufo over pokhara [The Times of India]timesofindia.indiatimes.comSource details in endnotes.

The 1968 Himalayan cases: Nepal’s core UFO file

The key Nepal UFO chronology begins on 19 February 1968, when a bright, fast-moving object was reportedly seen over Olangchung Gola and Ghunsa in Taplejung district, close to the border with China. The Himalayan Times, summarising a confidential CIA information report, says the object was seen between 21:00 and 21:25 local time and moved from north-east to south-west. [The Himalayan Times]thehimalayantimes.comThe Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 yearsThe Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 years

The more famous case followed on 25 March 1968 in Kaski, near Pokhara. The CIA-linked description says a blazing object, flashing intermittently and accompanied by a loud thunder-like sound, disintegrated over the region. The report then described a metallic disc-shaped object, said to be six feet at the base and four feet high, found in a crater at Baltichaur, with additional portions reportedly found at Talakot and Turepasal. [The Himalayan Times]thehimalayantimes.comThe Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 yearsThe Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 years

Nepali Times revisited the Pokhara story in 2024 and added local memory to the archival record. Its reporting places the event at about 8.15 pm in Batulechaur, where residents recalled a bright object, a loud sound and later a sheet-like metal fragment retrieved from a field. The article also notes that witness recollections diverge on what happened to the material afterwards: some accounts say it passed through local official hands, while others suggest it was eventually packed and taken away by American officials. [Nepali Times]nepalitimes.comufo over pokharaufo over pokhara

The 1968 cases are compelling as historical UFO records, but not as proof of extraterrestrial craft. They are official enough to show that US intelligence paid attention; they are not complete enough to identify the object. The surviving public record does not provide a chain of custody for the alleged fragments, laboratory analysis, photographs sufficient for independent assessment, radar data, or a final technical conclusion. Kathmandu Post’s later commentary made this point plainly: the object cannot be identified because the remains are missing from the accessible record. [Kathmandu Post]kathmandupost.comon ufos and yetison ufos and yetis

The strongest ordinary explanations for 1968

The most plausible explanations for the 1968 Nepal incidents fall into three broad categories: re-entering space hardware, military activity, or a natural fireball. None is proven from the public record, but each explains part of the evidence better than an alien-craft hypothesis.

A re-entry explanation fits the bright, fragmenting, thunderous nature of the Kaski event. Nepali Times reported that on 28 August 1968 the US Embassy in Kathmandu suggested the object could have been of Soviet origin, possibly connected to the re-entry of a rocket associated with the Kosmos 208 satellite. That does not close the case, especially because the timing and multiple Himalayan sightings remain awkward, but it gives the claim a historically grounded Cold War context. [Nepali Times]nepalitimes.comufo over pokharaufo over pokhara

A military explanation is also credible because the region was strategically sensitive. Nepali Times notes that US military aircraft were flying night-time supply missions from Indian bases to Khampa guerrilla camps in Mustang, north of Pokhara, during the period. The same article raises the possibility that some sightings could have involved aircraft, missiles, contrails or other military activity rather than unknown technology. [Nepali Times]nepalitimes.comufo over pokharaufo over pokhara

A meteor or bolide explanation is possible for parts of the story, especially the bright flash, fragmentation and loud report. NASA defines a fireball as an unusually bright meteor, and bolides can produce explosive flashes or sonic phenomena when entering the atmosphere. However, a pure meteor explanation struggles with the reported recovery of sizeable metal fragments unless those fragments were misdescribed, later conflated with another object, or came from human-made debris. [CNEOS]cneos.jpl.nasa.govOpen source on nasa.gov.

The fairest classification is therefore “contested and unresolved”, not “confirmed”. The 1968 Pokhara/Kaski case is Nepal’s most important UFO incident because it has an official archival trace and local testimony; it is also the clearest example of why missing physical evidence prevents a confident conclusion. [The Himalayan Times]thehimalayantimes.comThe Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 yearsThe Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 years [Kathmandu Post]kathmandupost.comon ufos and yetison ufos and yetis

Modern Nepal sightings are mostly light-in-the-sky reports

After 1968, Nepal’s public UFO record becomes thinner and more familiar: lights, flashes, brief objects, and isolated reports. NUFORC entries include a 2008 Kathmandu report of a sphere or “horizontal moving star”, a 2011 Kathmandu claim of about a dozen bright objects in the western sky, a 2016 Kathmandu blinking object that NUFORC itself annotated with the possibility of a star, and a 2024 Biratnagar report of a small silver object that allegedly disappeared quickly. [NUFORC]nuforc.orgOpen source on nuforc.org. [NUFORC]nuforc.orgOpen source on nuforc.org. [NUFORC]nuforc.orgOpen source on nuforc.org.

These entries are useful as folklore and public-reporting data, but weak as evidence. They generally lack multiple independent witnesses, triangulation, original instrument data, air-traffic correlation, astronomical checks or recovered material. They also show a common pattern in UFO archives worldwide: ordinary celestial objects, satellites, aircraft lights, drones, balloons and perception errors can look strange when viewed briefly, at night, or without distance cues. NASA’s UAP guidance is directly relevant here: most sightings provide very limited data, making firm scientific conclusions difficult. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience UAP FAQsScience UAP FAQs

The 2016 Kathmandu case illustrates the problem. The witness described a blinking multi-coloured object in the northern sky for about an hour; NUFORC’s note suggested “Star??”, which is a reasonable possibility because bright stars and planets can appear to flicker and change colour near the horizon or through turbulent air. That does not prove the witness was wrong; it shows why long-duration blinking lights need astronomical cross-checking before being treated as anomalous. [NUFORC]nuforc.orgOpen source on nuforc.org.

The 2020 Gandaki fireball shows how a UFO becomes identifiable

The 2020 Gandaki event is one of the best examples of a Nepal sighting moving towards a conventional explanation. On 27 March 2020, The Himalayan Times reported that people in Gandaki Province had seen a bright object in the evening sky, prompting speculation online. The Nepal Astronomical Society urged witnesses to provide evidence and said the object was probably a fireball or bolide, meaning a very bright meteor, possibly one that explodes in the atmosphere. [The Himalayan Times]thehimalayantimes.comThe Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 yearsThe Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 years

This is exactly how a healthy UFO investigation should work. The first public label may be “unknown”, but the next step is not to jump to aliens; it is to collect time, direction, location, video, sound reports and possible fragments. NASA’s fireball definitions support the Society’s cautious interpretation: bright meteors can be dramatic, visible across wide areas, and sometimes accompanied by fragmentation or delayed sound. [CNEOS]cneos.jpl.nasa.govCNEOSFireballs and bolidesCNEOSFireballs and bolides

The Gandaki case is therefore best classified as “probably identified”, not “debunked as a hoax”. There is no need to accuse witnesses of inventing anything. A real sky event can be sincerely reported, widely discussed, and still have a natural explanation. For readers assessing Nepal UFO claims, this distinction is crucial: many sightings are genuine experiences without being evidence of exotic craft. [The Himalayan Times]thehimalayantimes.comThe Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 yearsThe Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 years

Satellites, drones and border confusion are now part of the Nepal picture

Modern Nepal sightings increasingly occur in a sky full of human-made objects. Drone use, satellite constellations and cross-border security concerns all create new ways for lights to be misread as UFOs. Nepal’s aviation authority maintains a dedicated drone registration and requirements page, which shows that unmanned aircraft are now a regulated part of the national airspace environment rather than a rare novelty. [caanepal.gov.np]caanepal.gov.npSource details in endnotes.

The 2025 India-Nepal border episode shows how quickly an aerial ambiguity can become a security story. The Times of India reported that around 15 to 20 luminous, drone-like objects were seen near the Kamala Border Outpost in Jaynagar, prompting alert measures and communication with Nepalese security officials. The same report noted speculation that the lights could have been a Starlink satellite train, a plausible category because newly launched Starlink satellites can appear as a chain of bright moving lights shortly after sunset or before sunrise. [The Times of India]timesofindia.indiatimes.comSource details in endnotes.

This matters for Nepal because the country’s geography makes distance and altitude judgement difficult. A satellite train far above Earth, a drone near a border post, a high aircraft catching sunlight, or a meteor over the hills may all be described as “lights moving over Nepal”. Without precise timing, compass direction, elevation angle and video metadata, the same sighting can support several competing stories. [Space]space.comWhile these formations have fascinated skywatchers, they raise concerns among astronomers due to potential interference with observations…

Confirmed, contested and debunked: a practical evidence split

Nepal’s UFO material becomes much clearer when sorted by evidence quality rather than by mystery value.

Confirmed as reported, not confirmed as exotic: The 1968 Himalayan reports are confirmed in the limited sense that declassified US intelligence material and later Nepali reporting record them as reported sightings. They are not confirmed as alien craft, advanced vehicles or even a single type of object. The key missing piece is the alleged Kaski material itself, along with any public laboratory analysis. [The Himalayan Times]thehimalayantimes.comThe Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 yearsThe Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 years [Kathmandu Post]kathmandupost.comon ufos and yetison ufos and yetis

Contested and unresolved: The Pokhara/Kaski incident remains the strongest unresolved case because it combines a sky event with alleged debris. Its competing explanations include re-entering space hardware, military debris, aircraft-related activity, or a natural bolide with later confusion about recovered fragments. No public source currently resolves those alternatives. [Nepali Times]nepalitimes.comufo over pokharaufo over pokhara

Probably identified: The 2020 Gandaki event is best treated as a likely fireball or bolide, following Nepal Astronomical Society’s public response and the known behaviour of bright meteors. It is a good example of a “UFO” in the literal sense becoming less mysterious once specialists ask for evidence and compare it with known sky phenomena. [The Himalayan Times]thehimalayantimes.comThe Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 yearsThe Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 years

Low-evidence public reports: Kathmandu, Biratnagar and Butwal entries in open UFO databases are worth noting but should not be over-weighted. NUFORC’s Nepal list is small, and individual entries are mostly witness descriptions rather than investigated case files. They may still be useful for mapping public perception, but they do not by themselves establish anomalous technology. [NUFORC]nuforc.orgOpen source on nuforc.org. [NUFORC]nuforc.orgOpen source on nuforc.org.

Likely misidentifications in the modern sky: Satellite trains, drones, aircraft lights and bright astronomical objects are increasingly strong candidates for many present-day sightings. The more a report describes multiple lights moving in formation shortly after sunset, the more satellite checks become essential before any stronger claim is made. [Space]space.comWhile these formations have fascinated skywatchers, they raise concerns among astronomers due to potential interference with observations…

What official records do and do not show

The most important official material connected to Nepal is the declassified CIA reporting on the 1968 Himalayan sightings. It shows that American intelligence took reports from Nepal and neighbouring Himalayan areas seriously enough to record and circulate them. It does not show that the CIA identified the objects as extraterrestrial, recovered alien technology, or reached a hidden public conclusion in the available record. [CIA]cia.govcia rdp81r00560r000100070007 8cia rdp81r00560r000100070007 8 [The Himalayan Times]thehimalayantimes.comThe Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 yearsThe Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 years

This distinction is often lost in retellings. A government document about a UFO is not the same as a government document proving an alien craft. “UFO” and “UAP” mean unidentified at the time of reporting, not necessarily extraordinary in origin. AARO, the US office now responsible for UAP work, defines UAP broadly as objects or phenomena that are not immediately identifiable across air, sea, space or transmedium contexts. [AARO]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.

NASA’s recent public position also supports a cautious reading of Nepal’s cases. NASA says there are no data supporting UAP as evidence of alien technologies, and that most sightings produce limited data. Its independent study emphasised better collection and analysis rather than sensational conclusions. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience UAP FAQsScience UAP FAQs

For Nepal, that means the most honest position is neither ridicule nor belief. The official record confirms that unusual Himalayan reports existed. It does not confirm what they were.

How to evaluate a Nepal UFO claim

A strong Nepal UFO report should answer basic questions before it is treated as anomalous. The most useful details are exact time, location, direction of travel, elevation above the horizon, duration, sound, weather, camera metadata, nearby airports or drone activity, and whether other observers saw the same thing from different places. A short phone video without metadata is helpful, but rarely decisive on its own. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience UAP FAQsScience UAP FAQs

The first checks should be ordinary-sky checks: bright planets, aircraft routes, satellite passes, recent rocket launches, Starlink trains, meteor reports and local drone activity. This is especially important in Nepal because valleys and mountains can distort impressions of altitude and distance, while clear Himalayan skies make satellites and meteors visually striking. [space]space.comWhile these formations have fascinated skywatchers, they raise concerns among astronomers due to potential interference with observations… Physical evidence would change the standard of discussion. The reason the 1968 Kaski case still attracts attention is the alleged recovery of material. If a comparable incident happened today, the most important evidence would be secure preservation of fragments, independent laboratory analysis, photographs of the site before disturbance, documented custody, and correlation with satellite re-entry or aviation records. Without those, even an impressive story remains unresolved rather than confirmed. [Kathmandu Post]kathmandupost.comon ufos and yetison ufos and yetis

What Nepal adds to the wider country-by-country UFO project

Nepal’s page in a country-by-country UFO project should be read alongside sibling branches on India, Bhutan, Tibet-facing Himalayan regions and Cold War-era South Asia. The 1968 cases were not isolated inside Nepal’s borders; they were part of a Himalayan sequence spanning Ladakh, Sikkim, Bhutan and Nepal, with directions and locations that made strategic geography hard to ignore. [asian]asianage.com6 ufos sighted over india nepal bhutan in 1968 cia report6 ufos sighted over india nepal bhutan in 1968 cia report

Nepal’s distinctive contribution is the Pokhara/Kaski debris claim. Many countries have light-in-the-sky reports; fewer have a case where a declassified intelligence summary mentions an alleged metallic object in a crater and local witnesses later recall a fallen sheet-like object. That does not make it extraterrestrial. It makes it historically valuable, because it sits at the intersection of local memory, intelligence archives, Cold War aviation, possible space debris and the limits of public evidence. [Nepali Times]nepalitimes.comufo over pokharaufo over pokhara [Kathmandu Post]kathmandupost.comon ufos and yetison ufos and yetis

The overall verdict is restrained but interesting: Nepal has one genuinely significant historical UFO file, a few modern probable misidentifications, and a thin scattering of public reports. Its strongest lesson is that the word “unidentified” should be preserved carefully. It marks a gap in evidence, not a licence to fill that gap with the most dramatic explanation.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to What Really Happened in Nepal's UFO Record?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

The UFO Experience

By Joseph Allen Hynek

Useful for understanding how unexplained aerial events are evaluated.

See on Amazon

Book

How UFOs Conquered the World

By David Clarke

Places regional UFO stories within wider global patterns.

See on Amazon

Book

UFOs

By Leslie Kean

Fits a page focused on weighing evidence and documented cases.

See on Amazon

Book

Meteor Science and Engineering

By Donald William Robert McKinley

Relevant to Nepal's meteor and sonic-boom-related incidents.

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon: The UFO Experience How UFOs Conquered the World UFOs

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Endnotes

1. Source: science.nasa.gov
   Title: Science UAP FAQs
   Link: https://science.nasa.gov/uap/faqs/

2. Source: cneos.jpl.nasa.gov
   Title: CNEOSFireballs and bolides
   Link: https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/fireballs/intro.html

3. Source: nuforc.org
   Link: https://nuforc.org/ndx/?id=loc

4. Source: nuforc.org
   Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=63576

5. Source: nuforc.org
   Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=130025

6. Source: nuforc.org
   Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=85883

7. Source: space.com
   Link: https://www.space.com/starlink-satellite-train-how-to-see-and-track-it
   Source snippet

   While these formations have fascinated skywatchers, they raise concerns among astronomers due to potential interference with observations...

8. Source: nuforc.org
   Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=183133

9. Source: aaro.mil
   Link: https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/

10. Source: caanepal.gov.np
    Link: https://caanepal.gov.np/drone

11. Source: heavens-above.com
    Link: https://www.heavens-above.com/

12. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=190619

13. Source: cia.gov
    Title: cia rdp81r00560r000100070007 8
    Link: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp81r00560r000100070007-8

14. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/

15. Source: science.nasa.gov
    Title: Science UAP
    Link: https://science.nasa.gov/uap/

16. Source: cneos.jpl.nasa.gov
    Link: https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/fireballs/

17. Source: cia.gov
    Link: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP81R00560R000100070007-8.pdf

18. Source: science.nasa.gov
    Title: uap independent study team final report
    Link: https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report.pdf

19. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/FOIA/2023%20FOIAs/23-F-1423.pdf

20. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/AARO_Mission_Brief_2025.pdf

21. Source: war.gov
    Title: dod examining unidentified anomalous phenomena
    Link: https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3965403/dod-examining-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena/

22. Source: heavens-above.com
    Link: https://heavens-above.com/StarLink.aspx

23. Source: heavens-above.com
    Link: https://www.heavens-above.com/starlinklaunchpasses.aspx

24. Source: in-the-sky.org
    Link: https://in-the-sky.org/satpasses.php

25. Source: thehimalayantimes.com
    Title: The Himalayan Times UFOs over Nepal? CIA had reported two sightings 49 years
    Link: https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/ufos-nepal-cia-reported-two-sightings-49-years-ago

26. Source: kathmandupost.com
    Title: on ufos and yetis
    Link: https://kathmandupost.com/opinion/2019/02/08/on-ufos-and-yetis

27. Source: thehimalayantimes.com
    Title: astronomical society urges people to send evidence on sighting
    Link: https://thehimalayantimes.com/science-and-tech/astronomical-society-urges-people-to-send-evidence-on-sighting

28. Source: nepalitimes.com
    Title: ufo over pokhara
    Link: https://nepalitimes.com/ufo-over-pokhara

29. Source: timesofindia.indiatimes.com
    Link: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/high-alert-at-india-nepal-border-after-spotting-of-drone-like-luminous-objects/articleshow/121438702.cms

30. Source: facebook.com
    Title: Nepal Astronomical Society
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/NASONepal/posts/pressreleasethe-object-seen-in-the-nepali-sky-this-evening-is-probably-a-firebal/3025232930820885/

31. Source: asianage.com
    Title: 6 ufos sighted over india nepal bhutan in 1968 cia report
    Link: https://www.asianage.com/india/all-india/280117/6-ufos-sighted-over-india-nepal-bhutan-in-1968-cia-report.html

32. Source: Wikipedia
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pokhara

33. Source: Wikipedia
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolide

34. Source: thehimalayantimes.com
    Title: there is stuff enduring mysteries trail us report on ufos
    Link: https://thehimalayantimes.com/science-and-tech/there-is-stuff-enduring-mysteries-trail-us-report-on-ufos

35. Source: thehimalayantimes.com
    Title: school times the mystery
    Link: https://thehimalayantimes.com/entertainment/school-times-the-mystery

36. Source: thehimalayantimes.com
    Title: govt shuts down ufo hunting unit
    Link: https://thehimalayantimes.com/news-archives/govt-shuts-down-ufo-hunting-unit

37. Source: ebsco.com
    Link: https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/astronomy-and-astrophysics/fireball

38. Source: space.stackexchange.com
    Title: how do the starlink satellites shine
    Link: https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/40527/how-do-the-starlink-satellites-shine

Additional References

1. Source: youtube.com
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWRP06hGvEs
   Source snippet

   The Strange UFO CRASH in POKHARA 60 years ago || Misguided Nepal...

2. Source: youtube.com
   Title: The Strange UFO CRASH in POKHARA 60 years ago || Misguided Nepal
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lc4HZC1G1FY
   Source snippet

   Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Independent Study Report...

3. Source: youtube.com
   Title: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Independent Study Report
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQcqOW39ksk
   Source snippet

   UFO Videos Explained: Mick West's Expert Analysis...

4. Source: youtube.com
   Title: UFO Videos Explained: Mick West’s Expert Analysis
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_4QF__92q0
   Source snippet

   Pentagon UFO files show no alien evidence, analyst says...

5. Source: facebook.com
   Link: https://www.facebook.com/onTHT/posts/the-object-seen-in-the-nepali-sky-this-evening-is-probably-a-fireball-or-a-bolid/3006929359346380/

6. Source: facebook.com
   Link: https://www.facebook.com/cbsphiladelphia/posts/a-fireball-also-known-as-a-boldie-is-an-astronomical-term-for-a-bright-meteor-th/618287180447794/

7. Source: facebook.com
   Link: https://www.facebook.com/nonextquestion/posts/a-mysterious-bright-object-with-a-long-glowing-tail-was-seen-in-the-sky-across-s/913087574969414/

8. Source: facebook.com
   Link: https://www.facebook.com/WSJ/posts/an-independent-team-appointed-by-nasa-says-it-hasnt-found-evidence-of-extraterre/700299601956640/

9. Source: medium.com
   Link: https://medium.com/%40souravmohile/analysing-fireball-and-bolide-events-using-nasa-data-33945b7af4ac

10. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/askastronomy/comments/1i7inn7/can_someone_explain_why_im_seeing_these/