What Is Really Seen Over Ukraine?

Introduction

Ukraine’s current relevance is also practical. Since Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022, Ukrainian airspace has been among the most watched in Europe, but also among the most confusing: combat drones, decoys, thermal sensors, electronic warfare, air alerts, missiles, satellites, and battlefield rumours all increase both the chance of recording something odd and the chance of misidentifying it. Ukrainian reports therefore deserve attention, but they need a stricter evidence standard than ordinary civilian skywatching. [Universe Space Tech]universemagazine.comSource details in endnotes.

Why Ukraine’s UFO record is different

Ukraine’s UFO history cannot be separated from the Soviet system that governed the country for most of the twentieth century. In the late Soviet period, anomalous aerial reports were not treated only as folklore. The Soviet research programme described by researchers such as Vladimir Rubtsov collected reports through military and scientific channels, with a January 1980 directive allowing the armed forces to gather accounts of unusual phenomena across the USSR. That programme reportedly accumulated around 3,000 pieces of testimony, data, and correspondence, with special priority for cases involving alleged equipment effects or military relevance. [Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSource details in endnotes.

That background matters for Ukraine because Ukrainian sightings from the Soviet period were part of a larger reporting culture in which “UFO” did not automatically mean “extraterrestrial”. The Soviet framework recognised three broad possibilities: human activity, natural atmospheric or space phenomena, and extraterrestrial civilisation, while treating the last as possible but not favoured. The practical outcome was more prosaic: many mass night sightings were eventually associated with rocket launches or aerospace tests whose exhaust clouds could look enormous, silent, bright, and structured from hundreds or thousands of kilometres away. [Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSource details in endnotes.

Ukraine’s post-independence record adds another layer. The Scientific Research Centre for Analyses of Anomalies “Zond” was founded in 2004 and presents itself as a Ukrainian successor to earlier local commissions on anomalous phenomena. Its researchers have focused not only on sightings but also on preserving and digitising archives from Ukraine and the wider former Soviet space. [ufology-news.com]ufology-news.comOpen source on ufology-news.com.

The result is a national record with three distinct kinds of material: inherited Soviet-era official or semi-official reports, Ukrainian civilian and research-group archives, and modern wartime sensor or witness reports. These categories should not be blended together. A rumoured Soviet military case, a Zond archive entry, and a drone video from the front line may all be called “UFO” in popular writing, but their evidential value is very different.

A compact chronology of Ukrainian UFO reporting

Ukraine does not have a single canonical UFO chronology comparable to a national aviation accident database. Instead, its record is scattered across Soviet-era programmes, local research groups, media reports, astronomy papers, and recent wartime accounts. The useful way to read it is by evidence environment.

Soviet period: reports inside a closed state system. During the USSR, Ukrainian territory was part of a wider network where military personnel and state-linked scientific bodies could pass along reports of anomalous phenomena. The Soviet research programme’s strongest finding is a cautionary one: impressive mass sightings often became identifiable when checked against rocket launches and aerospace events. [Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSource details in endnotes.

Post-Soviet Ukraine: local research and archive preservation. After independence, Ukrainian ufology became more visible through groups such as SRCAA Zond, which has described efforts to collect, classify, and preserve Ukrainian and former Soviet anomalous-phenomena materials. Interviews with Ukrainian researchers also point to state-linked meteorological testimony collections, including 30 testimonies reportedly received by Zond after a 2009 request to Ukraine’s Central Geophysical Observatory, with additional records from 2016 and 2018. [uapcheck.com]uapcheck.comufology in ukraine interview with igor kalytyukpart 1UAP Check…

2018–2022: Kyiv-region astronomical claims. The most internationally visible Ukrainian UFO claim came from researchers associated with the Main Astronomical Observatory of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Papers posted in 2022 claimed observations of fast “phantom” objects over Kyiv and the village of Vinarivka, using daytime sky monitoring and colour analysis. The authors explicitly said they did not interpret the objects as alien craft, but the claimed sizes and speeds attracted global attention and criticism. [arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv Unidentified aerial phenomena II. Evaluation of UAP propertiesarXiv Unidentified aerial phenomena II. Evaluation of UAP properties

2022 onward: wartime sightings and military relevance. Since the full-scale Russian invasion, the meaning of “UFO” in Ukraine has become more security-focused. Ukrainian science media reported in May 2026 that electronic warfare specialist Serhii Beskrestnov had described repeated unexplained sightings over combat zones and argued that unknown aerial objects should be treated as possible enemy technology until identified. [Universe Space Tech]universemagazine.comSource details in endnotes.

This chronology shows why Ukraine is a high-noise, high-interest case. There are more cameras, more sensors, and more motivated observers than in peacetime, but there are also more ordinary sources of false mystery.

The Kyiv “phantoms”: the most famous scientific claim

The Kyiv “phantoms” case is the central modern Ukrainian UFO controversy because it came from astronomers rather than anonymous witnesses. A 2022 paper by B. E. Zhilyaev and colleagues described daytime observations of dark objects in the Kyiv region, including claims of very high speeds and substantial sizes. A later arXiv paper claimed observations from Kyiv and Vinarivka and described oval-shaped dark objects appearing for fractions of a second. [arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv Unidentified aerial phenomena II. Evaluation of UAP propertiesarXiv Unidentified aerial phenomena II. Evaluation of UAP properties

The claim was interesting because it tried to use instruments, not just testimony. It was also vulnerable for the same reason: once an instrumental method is described, other analysts can test whether the method supports the conclusion. The key issue was distance. A small insect close to a camera and a large object far away can both cross the frame quickly. If distance is inferred incorrectly, a fly can become a huge, hypersonic “phantom” on paper.

Sceptical investigator Mick West argued that some of the published images resembled near-camera insects and that the paper’s colour-based distance method depended on assumptions about object darkness and reflectivity. He also argued that similar contrast curves could be generated with nearby flies, making the claimed distance and speed estimates unreliable. [Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSource details in endnotes.

The most damaging response was not from a casual debunker but from within the Ukrainian scientific establishment. According to Skeptical Inquirer’s account, the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine reviewed the work after public attention and concluded that the article was pseudo-scientific in form and content, citing inaccuracies, simplifications, and unsupported conclusions. Avi Loeb of the Galileo Project also argued that objects moving at the claimed speeds and sizes should have produced visible fireballs rather than appearing as dark bodies. [Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSource details in endnotes.

The case is therefore best classified as contested and probably methodologically weak, not as confirmed evidence of extraordinary craft. Its lasting value is methodological: Ukraine’s best-known UFO paper illustrates how a real image can still support a false conclusion if distance, scale, and sensor context are mishandled.

Wartime Ukraine: why “UFO” often means “identify this threat”

In wartime Ukraine, the term UFO has a different practical meaning from its pop-culture use. An unidentified object may be a Russian drone, a Ukrainian drone, a decoy, a balloon, a missile fragment, a satellite, an aircraft seen under unusual lighting, electronic warfare clutter, or an optical artefact. That is why a Ukrainian military or defence-linked observer can take UFO reports seriously without implying anything extraterrestrial.

Ukrainian science outlet Universe Today Ukraine reported in May 2026 that Serhii Beskrestnov, widely known for commentary on communications and electronic warfare, said unexplained phenomena had been observed over combat zones and urged reporting because an unknown object might be a new enemy weapon. The same report noted that early in the full-scale invasion, inexperienced troops sometimes fired at lights later identified as satellites, the International Space Station, or planets. [Universe Space Tech]universemagazine.comSource details in endnotes.

This wartime context improves and worsens the evidence at the same time. It improves it because drones, thermal cameras, and military observation networks can capture data that ordinary witnesses cannot. It worsens it because combat footage is often incomplete, compressed, stripped of metadata, filmed through sensors optimised for targeting rather than scientific measurement, and released through social media without chain-of-custody details.

This is exactly the broader problem identified by official UAP investigators elsewhere. The US All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office has noted that many UAP sightings consist only of vague narrative accounts, and even hard sensor data is often incomplete or low quality because military sensors are calibrated for combat tasks, not anomaly science. [aaro.mil]aaro.milAARO Historical Record Report Vol 1 2024AARO_Historical_Record_Repor…6 Mar 2024 — Most UAP sightings have no data associated with them beyond an often vague narrative account…

For Ukraine, the practical rule is simple: wartime UFO reports should be treated first as air-defence, intelligence, or sensor-identification problems. The extraordinary question comes only after ordinary threats and artefacts are excluded.

The 2026 six-pointed drone video

The most visible recent Ukrainian case is a reported drone video of a six-pointed or star-like object, discussed in May 2026 after Beskrestnov’s posts. Kyiv Post described the footage as showing a spherical object with six pointed cones and a heat plume, reportedly filmed during combat operations. Universe Today Ukraine similarly reported that footage was said to have been captured by a drone near an unidentified object at roughly 800 metres above the ground. [Kyiv Post]kyivpost.comKyiv Post Senior Ukraine Official Reports Armed Forces Sighted UFOKyiv Post Senior Ukraine Official Reports Armed Forces Sighted UFO

The case remains unresolved publicly because the strongest necessary materials are missing: original full-resolution files, sensor metadata, exact location, exact time, independent radar or optical corroboration, and a clear chain of custody. Open-source analysts on Metabunk treated the footage cautiously, proposing possibilities such as an infrared decoy, a balloon-mounted object, optical diffraction spikes, reflection in a gimbal dome, or CGI. The discussion also noted that the star shape appeared to remain level relative to the sensor in part of the footage, which raises the possibility of a camera or optical effect rather than a solid object rotating in space. [Metabunk]metabunk.orgUkrainian drone footage of 6 pointed star | MetabunkUkrainian drone footage of 6 pointed star | Metabunk [Metabunk]metabunk.orgukrainian uap study observation of events.12607ukrainian uap study observation of events.12607

This does not mean the video is fake, nor that it is solved. It means the public evidence is not yet strong enough to support an extraordinary interpretation. In a combat zone, a strange thermal or optical signature could matter greatly even if it is entirely human-made. The responsible classification is unresolved, security-relevant, and technically underdetermined.

Region-level variation inside Ukraine

Ukraine’s UFO reports are not evenly meaningful across the country because the observation environment differs sharply by region. Kyiv and the Kyiv region appear repeatedly in modern claims because of astronomical monitoring, dense population, media visibility, and the presence of research institutions. The Kyiv “phantoms” papers used observations from Kyiv and Vinarivka in the south of Kyiv region, making this area the best-known scientific-claim cluster. [arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv Unidentified aerial phenomena II. Evaluation of UAP propertiesarXiv Unidentified aerial phenomena II. Evaluation of UAP properties

Front-line and near-front regions are different. They produce more militarily interesting reports because they are saturated with drones, thermal cameras, electronic warfare, missiles, decoys, air-defence activity, and nervous observers. The same factors make reports harder to interpret publicly because full operational context is often classified or unsafe to release. [Universe Space Tech]universemagazine.comSource details in endnotes.

There is also a reporting-bias problem. Areas with more cameras, soldiers, air alerts, and social media attention will appear to have more UFOs even if the underlying rate of unusual phenomena is not higher. Conversely, rural areas may produce fewer documented cases not because nothing happens there, but because fewer observations are recorded, preserved, or digitised.

For readers, the important distinction is not “which Ukrainian region has the most UFOs?” but “which region has the strongest observation context?” Kyiv-region instrument claims, front-line drone videos, and older meteorological testimony collections are different evidence types and should not be ranked by raw report count alone.

Official records and archive reliability

Ukraine’s strongest archive story is not a single declassified alien file. It is the survival and partial digitisation of anomalous-phenomena records from Soviet and post-Soviet research cultures. Zond-linked researchers have described “Global Archive” and “Heritage” projects aimed at preserving UAP archives, and UAP Check’s interview with Igor Kalytyuk describes a large electronic collection of books, bulletins, publications, and paper documents organised by country, organisation, or ministry. [ufology-news.com]ufology-news.comAN D «HERITAGE» FOR THE SAVING OF UAP-ARCHIVESAN D «HERITAGE» FOR THE SAVING OF UAP-ARCHIVES

These archives are valuable, but their value is historical and investigative rather than automatically evidential. A stored testimony proves that someone reported something; it does not prove that the reported object was anomalous. The best archives preserve enough context to allow later identification: date, time, direction, angular size, duration, weather, aircraft activity, astronomical conditions, sensor type, and original images or files.

The Ukrainian record also includes local-state or state-adjacent channels. Kalytyuk’s interview refers to anomalous-phenomena testimony collected through Ukrainian meteorological services and to Zond receiving 30 testimonies after a 2009 request, later supplemented by several more. That is important because meteorological observers are often better trained than casual witnesses, but it still does not remove the need for independent checking. [uapcheck.com]uapcheck.com2024 07 06 a short history of ufo research in the former soviet union2024 07 06 a short history of ufo research in the former soviet union

The most reliable Ukrainian cases will therefore be those with original data and cross-checkable context, not those with the most dramatic story. A report with a dull explanation and complete metadata is more useful than a spectacular account with no date, no location, no original file, and no independent corroboration.

Confirmed, contested, and debunked claims

Ukraine’s UFO material is easiest to understand when sorted by evidence quality.

Confirmed as reports, not confirmed as exotic objects. Ukraine clearly has many UFO and UAP reports, including civilian testimony, research-group archives, wartime sightings, and drone footage claims. Zond-linked interviews and Ukrainian science-media reporting support the existence of active reporting channels and large volumes of reports, including claims of thousands of wartime-era submissions. [uapcheck.com]uapcheck.comufology in ukraine interview with igor kalytyukpart 1UAP Check…

Contested scientific claims. The Kyiv “phantoms” papers are real publications or preprints, but their conclusions are heavily disputed. The central objections concern scale, distance, colour analysis, lack of released underlying data, and the plausibility of dark high-speed objects not producing expected optical effects. [Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSource details in endnotes.

Probably explained or weakly evidenced cases. Many wartime lights and aerial objects are plausibly satellites, planets, drones, balloons, decoys, sensor artefacts, or misread military activity. Ukrainian reporting itself has noted examples of troops mistaking familiar celestial or orbital objects for threats early in the invasion. [Universe Space Tech]universemagazine.comSource details in endnotes.

Debunking pattern from the Soviet record. The old Soviet archive lesson is especially relevant to Ukraine: mass night sightings that looked extraordinary were often explained by rocket launches and aerospace tests once correlated with launch schedules and viewing geometry. The Petrozavodsk case is outside Ukraine’s present national scope, but it is relevant as a Soviet sibling-branch example because it shaped the same investigative culture that later influenced Ukrainian anomaly research. [Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSource details in endnotes.

Currently unresolved public cases. The 2026 six-pointed drone footage remains unresolved in public. Plausible mundane hypotheses exist, but the available evidence does not conclusively establish one. It should be treated as an open identification problem, not as proof of non-human technology. [Metabunk]metabunk.orgUF Os and Aliens Ukrainian drone footage of 6 pointed star · Harabeck ·UF Os and Aliens Ukrainian drone footage of 6 pointed star · Harabeck ·

How to judge a Ukrainian UFO case

A useful Ukrainian UFO case is not one that looks strangest at first glance; it is one that survives structured checking. The following questions separate evidence from atmosphere:

1. Is the original file available? Screenshots, reposted clips, and compressed social-media videos are much weaker than original image or video files with metadata.
2. Is the location and time known precisely? Without time and location, investigators cannot check satellites, planets, aircraft, missile activity, weather balloons, air alerts, or battlefield events.
3. Is there independent corroboration? A drone video plus radar, a second camera, or multiple separated observers is stronger than one cropped clip.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to What Is Really Seen Over Ukraine?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

UFOs

By Leslie Kean

Matches a national overview focused on evidence and official reporting.

See on Amazon

Book

Passport to Magonia

By Jacques Vallee

Useful for understanding how UFO narratives evolve across societies.

See on Amazon

Book

The UFO Experience

By Joseph Allen Hynek

Explains classification and investigation of sightings.

See on Amazon

Book

In Plain Sight

By Ross Coulthart

Covers contemporary debates around government and military reporting.

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon: UFOs Passport to Magonia The UFO Experience

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

1. What was the sensor designed to do? A thermal camera, targeting sensor, smartphone, astronomical camera, and night-vision device all create different artefacts. Military sensors are often excellent for combat and poor for scientific anomaly measurement. aaro.mil
2. Could it be close rather than far away? This is the classic problem in UFO analysis. A nearby insect, fibre, reflection, balloon, or lens effect can look like a distant high-speed object if distance is assumed rather than measured. Skeptical Inquirer
3. Has the case been checked against ordinary sky objects? Satellites, the International Space Station, bright planets, meteors, aircraft, drones, and rocket effects are common sources of genuine but misidentified sightings. Universe Space Tech

This framework does not dismiss Ukrainian witnesses. It protects them from bad conclusions. In a country under attack, rapid identification matters: a mislabelled drone, decoy, or missile-related object can have real operational consequences.

What Ukraine adds to the wider UFO map

Ukraine’s UFO record is important because it connects three sibling branches of the global UAP story: Soviet state research, European-style civilian archiving, and twenty-first-century military sensor footage. It shows why “official interest” is not the same as “official confirmation”. States investigate unknown aerial objects because unknown aerial objects can be threats, mistakes, intrusions, or rare natural phenomena.

The Ukrainian record also warns against two opposite mistakes. The first is credulity: treating every unexplained wartime video as extraordinary because the setting is dramatic. The second is lazy dismissal: assuming that because many cases are misidentified, no unidentified case is worth checking. The better position is stricter and more useful: investigate each case as an identification problem, preserve original data, publish enough context for independent review when security allows, and classify the outcome honestly.

At present, the strongest evidence-supported conclusion is that Ukraine has a rich and unusually complex UFO-reporting environment, but no publicly available Ukrainian case establishes extraterrestrial craft or non-human technology. What Ukraine does have is a valuable test bed for serious UAP analysis: dense observation, real security stakes, historical archives, active local researchers, and a long list of cases where the difference between “unidentified” and “extraordinary” depends on evidence quality.

Endnotes

1. Source: aaro.mil
   Title: AARO Historical Record Report Vol 1 2024
   Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/AARO_Historical_Record_Report_Vol_1_2024.pdf
   Source snippet

   AARO_Historical_Record_Repor...6 Mar 2024 — Most UAP sightings have no data associated with them beyond an often vague narrative account...

2. Source: uapcheck.com
   Title: ufology in ukraine interview with igor kalytyukpart 1
   Link: https://www.uapcheck.com/news/id/2512/ufology-in-ukraine-interview-with-igor-kalytyukpart-1/
   Source snippet

   UAP Check...

3. Source: ufology-news.com
   Link: https://ufology-news.com/u/18672430/SRCAA_Zond/Gershtein_M._Short_story_of_UFO_research_in_a_former_Soviet_Union_and_in_Ukraine_independence_time_2015.pdf

4. Source: uapcheck.com
   Title: 2024 07 06 a short history of ufo research in the former soviet union
   Link: https://www.uapcheck.com/news/id/2024-07-06-a-short-history-of-ufo-research-in-the-former-soviet-union/

5. Source: arxiv.org
   Title: arXiv Unidentified aerial phenomena II. Evaluation of UAP properties
   Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.17085

6. Source: metabunk.org
   Title: Ukrainian drone footage of 6 pointed star | Metabunk
   Link: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/ukrainian-drone-footage-of-6-pointed-star.14880/

7. Source: aaro.mil
   Link: https://www.aaro.mil/

8. Source: ufology-news.com
   Title: AN D «HERITAGE» FOR THE SAVING OF UAP-ARCHIVES
   Link: https://ufology-news.com/u/18672430/SRCAA_Zond/Kalytyuk_I._Gershtein_M._Petrov_S._The_projects_Global_Archive_and_Heritage_for_the_saving_of_UAP-archives_2020.pdf

9. Source: arxiv.org
   Link: https://arxiv.org/html/2503.05627v1

10. Source: metabunk.org
    Title: ukrainian uap study observation of events.12607
    Link: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/ukrainian-uap-study-observation-of-events.12607/

11. Source: metabunk.org
    Title: UF Os and Aliens Ukrainian drone footage of 6 pointed star · Harabeck ·
    Link: https://www.metabunk.org/forums/ufos-and-aliens.10/

12. Source: metabunk.org
    Link: https://www.metabunk.org/forums/

13. Source: metabunk.org
    Link: https://www.metabunk.org/

14. Source: metabunk.org
    Link: https://www.metabunk.org/tags/uap/

15. Source: metabunk.org
    Link: https://www.metabunk.org/forums/general-discussion.2/

16. Source: ufology-news.com
    Title: Bilyk A. Anomalous phenomena methodology and practice of research 2015
    Link: https://ufology-news.com/u/18672430/SRCAA_Zond/Bilyk_A._Anomalous_phenomena_methodology_and_practice_of_research_2015.pdf

17. Source: ufology-news.com
    Title: Bilyk A. Anomalous Phenomena methodology and practice of research 2020
    Link: https://ufology-news.com/u/18672430/SRCAA_Zond/Bilyk_A._Anomalous_Phenomena_methodology_and_practice_of_research_2020.pdf

18. Source: ufology-news.com
    Link: https://ufology-news.com/u/18672430/SRCAA_Zond/Bilyk_A._Kirichenko_A._Anomalies_and_inevitability_of_humanity_cosmic_future_2015.pdf

19. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/

20. Source: youtube.com
    Title: UAP data released: Astrophysicist Avi Loeb breaks down declassified records
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ur0QX1eGCQI
    Source snippet

    Avi Loeb - Medium...

21. Source: skepticalinquirer.org
    Link: https://skepticalinquirer.org/newsletter/history-of-state-ufo-research-in-the-ussr/

22. Source: universemagazine.com
    Link: https://universemagazine.com/en/ufos-repeatedly-spotted-over-ukraine-during-the-large-scale-war/?srsltid=AfmBOoqB5wNtfR2Jtlu3Yi4bwlVXLbA3Exay8zR5s5KXXHxznEyvAFCk

23. Source: skepticalinquirer.org
    Title: Skeptical Inquirer UFOs over Kyiv | Skeptical Inquirer
    Link: https://skepticalinquirer.org/2022/12/ufos-over-kyiv/

24. Source: kyivpost.com
    Title: Kyiv Post Senior Ukraine Official Reports Armed Forces Sighted UFO
    Link: https://www.kyivpost.com/post/75962

25. Source: skepticalinquirer.org
    Link: https://skepticalinquirer.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2009/01/p47.pdf?ref=thegalacticmind.com

26. Source: themoscowtimes.com
    Link: https://www.themoscowtimes.com/all/52335?amp=1

Additional References

1. Source: youtube.com
   Title: UFO OVER UKRAINE? DRONEWATCHERS noticed it! Shocking secrets of the PENTAGON
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCeRUNRqebU
   Source snippet

   UAP data released: Astrophysicist Avi Loeb breaks down declassified records...

2. Source: youtube.com
   Title: UFOs OVER UKRAINE? Why the US IS HIDING THE TRUTH about aliens
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oo9s_SlsL8
   Source snippet

   UFO OVER UKRAINE? DRONEWATCHERS noticed it! Shocking secrets of the PENTAGON...

3. Source: nasa.gov
   Link: https://www.nasa.gov/

4. Source: youtube.com
   Title: Ukraine’s astronomers say there are tons of UFOs over Kyiv
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4g51PIm1sc
   Source snippet

   UFOs OVER UKRAINE? Why the US IS HIDING THE TRUTH about aliens...

5. Source: war.gov
   Title: department of defense releases the annual report on unidentified anomalous phen
   Link: https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3964824/department-of-defense-releases-the-annual-report-on-unidentified-anomalous-phen/

6. Source: facebook.com
   Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/Amateur.Microscopy/posts/879088712272545/

7. Source: academia.edu
   Link: https://www.academia.edu/121508627/Unidentified_aerial_phenomena_UAPs_over_Kyiv

8. Source: instagram.com
   Link: https://www.instagram.com/p/DYpsMN5EeHZ/

9. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
   Link: https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58787

10. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1tahzt8/closeups_of_the_uap_from_the_ukrainian_video/