What Indonesia's UFO Record Really Shows

Introduction

The most useful Indonesian cases are not the most spectacular ones. They are the ones that show how the phenomenon travels through local media, astronomy, aviation, folklore, photography, and online communities: the Alor story of 1959, the Surabaya reports during the Indonesia–Malaysia confrontation, the Mount Agung and Cilamaya photographs, the 2011 Yogyakarta crop circle, and the work of BETA-UFO as a civilian collector of reports. [VICE]vice.comBertemu Para Pemburu UFO di IndonesiaBertemu Para Pemburu UFO di Indonesia

Why Indonesia’s UFO record is unusually fragmented

Indonesia’s geography makes UFO reporting difficult to compare with countries that have a single dominant media and archival centre. Sightings have been reported from Java, Bali, Sumatra, Sulawesi, Kalimantan, East Nusa Tenggara, and Papua-adjacent regions, but the documentation varies sharply by place. Java produces the densest accessible record because it has the largest concentration of media outlets, universities, amateur astronomy groups, internet communities, and BETA-UFO activity. Bali appears repeatedly because of tourism and photography. Remote eastern cases, such as Alor and Pantar, are culturally memorable but much harder to verify because they depend heavily on later retellings.

A simple list of alleged Indonesian sightings includes reports from Sumatra in 1942, Medan and Malang in 1953, Alor and Pantar in 1959, Jakarta and Surabaya in the 1960s, Mount Agung in 1973, Cilamaya in 1975, Porong in 1977, Tarakan in the mid-1980s, Mount Salak in 1998, Denpasar in 2000, Pekanbaru in 2007, Padang in 2009, Seminyak in 2011, and Sanga-Sanga in 2015. That spread is useful as a map of reporting, not as a map of confirmed anomalous craft. The entries range from historic newspaper items and photograph claims to web-era eyewitness submissions and media stories. [Wikipedia]WikipediaUFO sightings in IndonesiaUFO sightings in Indonesia

The strongest pattern is not “UFOs prefer one Indonesian region”. It is that reports cluster where three things coincide: witnesses with access to media, a cultural vocabulary for calling something a UFO, and a later group willing to preserve the story. This matters because Indonesia’s UFO history can look more coherent than it is. A case preserved by BETA-UFO, cited in a newspaper, then repeated on social media may seem like three independent confirmations when it is often one original report moving through several channels.

The Salatun thread: the closest Indonesia has to an official UFO tradition

The central figure in Indonesian UFO history is Raden Jacob Salatun, an Indonesian Air Force officer associated with the founding of the National Institute of Aeronautics and Space, commonly known by its former acronym LAPAN. Salatun wrote early Indonesian UFO books, including a 1960 work on flying saucers, and later became a reference point for Indonesian enthusiasts who wanted the subject treated as a serious aerospace and security question rather than only as fantasy or folklore. [Wikimedia Commons]commons.wikimedia.orgCommons File:Menjingkap Rahasia Piring Terbang.pdfCommons File:Menjingkap Rahasia Piring Terbang.pdf

Salatun’s importance should not be overstated. His writings and status gave Indonesian UFO study prestige, but they did not create a transparent government archive of case files, radar records, pilot reports, or technical analyses. The historical record is closer to a respected aerospace figure taking the subject seriously than to an Indonesian state confirmation of non-human technology. BETA-UFO and later enthusiasts inherited this “serious investigation” posture, often presenting Salatun as a founding patron rather than as a source of conclusive proof. [VICE]vice.comBertemu Para Pemburu UFO di IndonesiaBertemu Para Pemburu UFO di Indonesia

This distinction is essential. In the United States, “official UFO files” usually means declassified military or intelligence documents. In Indonesia, the closest equivalent is more diffuse: Salatun’s writings, later civilian archives, media stories, and occasional statements by LAPAN scientists. Since 2021, LAPAN itself has no longer existed as a separate agency in the old form; it was merged with other national research bodies into the National Research and Innovation Agency, BRIN. That institutional change makes old claims about “LAPAN files” even more important to handle carefully, because modern BRIN is not a UFO-investigation body and no public Indonesian UAP archive comparable to the major US repositories is evident. [UN-SPIDER]un-spider.orgNational Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN) | UN-SPIDER Knowledge PortalNational Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN) | UN-SPIDER Knowledge Portal

A practical chronology of the better-known Indonesian cases

The Indonesian case record is best approached chronologically, with each incident assigned a confidence level. “Unidentified” does not mean “extraterrestrial”; it means the available public evidence does not allow a confident ordinary identification.

1959: Alor and Pantar, East Nusa Tenggara. The Alor incident is one of Indonesia’s most famous close-encounter stories. Later accounts describe unusual beings, local alarm, and police involvement, with the case later associated with Jacob Salatun’s notes. A 60th-anniversary publication states that Salatun recorded and studied the Alor incident and that three notes from him existed, including a communication to astronomer J. Allen Hynek in 1977. That makes Alor historically important inside Indonesian ufology, but the public evidence remains a chain of later reports rather than a robust file of contemporary forensic material. [dokumen.pub]dokumen.pub978-602-71493-5-9 - DOKUMEN.PUB…

1964: Surabaya during the Indonesia–Malaysia confrontation. This is often presented as Indonesia’s strongest military UFO episode: pilots or defence personnel allegedly saw and fired at a dark, mango-shaped object with coloured lights during a tense military period. The case’s appeal is obvious: military context, national-security pressure, and an alleged aerial pursuit. Yet the accessible record is largely secondary and tied to Salatun-linked retellings. It deserves attention as a security-era UFO narrative, but not the evidential status of a fully documented radar-and-interceptor file. [Wikipedia]WikipediaList of reported UFO sightingsList of reported UFO sightings

1973: Mount Agung, Bali. A Japanese tourist, Ryo Terumoto, reportedly photographed Mount Agung on 17 August 1973 and noticed a disc-shaped object only after the photo was developed. BETA-UFO describes it as an early Indonesian UFO photograph and notes that the image was later published in a Japanese magazine. The case is memorable because it is photographic rather than purely testimonial, but the public record available today does not settle whether the object was airborne, close to the lens, a photographic artefact, or something genuinely anomalous. [PERKUMPULAN PENGAMAT BENDA TERBANG ANEH]betaufo.idwisatawan jepang memotret penampakan ufo di gunung agung bali 1973wisatawan jepang memotret penampakan ufo di gunung agung bali 1973

1975: Cilamaya, West Java. The Cilamaya photograph is often treated as one of Indonesia’s classic UFO images, reportedly taken by Tony Hartono Rusman near an oil-tanker setting off the West Java coast. It has circulated widely in Indonesian UFO culture, including through BETA-UFO-linked discussion and media summaries. Its significance is cultural and archival: it is a rare Indonesian case with an image attached. Its weakness is familiar to many historic UFO photos: without the original negative, full chain of custody, camera settings, independent witnesses, and environmental reconstruction, it cannot bear the weight often placed on it. [Wikipedia]WikipediaCrop circleCrop circle

1977–2000: a wider Java–Bali run of reports. Lists of Indonesian sightings include Porong in 1977, Jakarta reports in 1977, Tarakan around 1984, Bandung in 1989, Mount Salak in 1998, and Denpasar in 2000. These cases vary widely in detail and source quality. Many are valuable as leads for a national chronology, but most are not strong enough, from public evidence alone, to classify as anything more than contested or unresolved witness reports. [Wikipedia]WikipediaLingkaran tanamanLingkaran tanaman

2007–2015: the web-era cases. Pekanbaru in 2007, Padang in 2009, Seminyak in 2011, and Sanga-Sanga in 2015 show how Indonesian UFO reporting shifted into online circulation. This period benefits from easier reporting and wider public archiving, but also suffers from the usual internet-age problems: low-resolution images, duplicated claims, missing metadata, and the rapid transformation of ordinary lights, balloons, aircraft, drones, or celestial objects into viral UFO stories. [Wikipedia]WikipediaJacob SalatunJacob Salatun

The 2011 Yogyakarta crop circle shows how fast a claim can harden

The 2011 crop circle at Rejosari village, Jogotirto, Berbah, Sleman, is one of the most instructive Indonesian UFO-related events because it moved quickly from local curiosity to national media story. ANTARA reported that a crop-circle pattern in a rice field was popularly believed by some to be the footprint of a UFO. Witness accounts included a claimed helicopter-like noise the previous night, while another local who had been nearby said he heard nothing unusual. [ANTARA News]en.antaranews.comufo related crop circle found in yogyakarta rice fieldufo related crop circle found in yogyakarta rice field

This case also produced one of the clearest sceptical responses from an Indonesian scientific authority. Thomas Djamaluddin of LAPAN argued that crop circles in general were often man-made and that UFOs were not treated in astronomy as extraterrestrial craft. Detik reported LAPAN’s confidence that the Sleman formation was human-made and that it would not send a team to investigate. [detiknews]news.detik.comnews Yakin Crop Circle Buatan Manusia, LAPAN Tak Akan Kirim Tim ke Slemannews Yakin Crop Circle Buatan Manusia, LAPAN Tak Akan Kirim Tim ke Sleman

The Yogyakarta crop circle is therefore better understood as a media-and-belief event than as a strong UFO case. Its value lies in showing the mechanics of Indonesian UFO culture: a strange visual pattern, local testimony, religious or symbolic interpretations, media amplification, enthusiast debate, and then a scientific rebuttal. It also links Indonesia to a global crop-circle pattern in which elaborate formations have repeatedly been shown to be compatible with human construction, art, hoaxing, or publicity.

Confirmed, contested, and debunked: how the evidence splits

A fair Indonesian UFO page needs to separate three categories that often get blurred.

Confirmed phenomena, not confirmed aliens. Some Indonesian UFO-related events are confirmed in the limited sense that something was reported, photographed, published, or publicly debated. The 2011 Sleman crop circle existed. BETA-UFO exists as a civilian organisation. Salatun’s 1960 book exists. The Mount Agung photograph claim exists in BETA-UFO’s archive. These facts do not confirm non-human craft; they confirm the presence of a report, image, cultural event, or research tradition. PERKUMPULAN PENGAMAT BENDA TERBANG ANEH [ANTARA News]en.antaranews.comufo related crop circle found in yogyakarta rice fieldufo related crop circle found in yogyakarta rice field [VICE]vice.comBertemu Para Pemburu UFO di IndonesiaBertemu Para Pemburu UFO di Indonesia

Contested cases. Alor, Surabaya 1964, Mount Agung 1973, Cilamaya 1975, and later regional sightings remain contested. They contain elements that make them interesting — alleged official attention, photographs, multiple witnesses, or unusual behaviour — but the public evidence is usually incomplete. In most cases, the missing pieces are precisely the ones that would raise evidential value: original records, independent contemporaneous documentation, radar data, verifiable chain of custody for images, and careful elimination of aircraft, astronomical objects, weather, balloons, drones, birds, insects, or camera artefacts.

Debunked or strongly explained claims. The 2011 Yogyakarta crop circle is the clearest example of an Indonesian UFO-adjacent claim that official scientific opinion treated as man-made. “Debunked” should not mean every individual detail was reconstructed with the names of the makers; it means the claim does not require a non-human explanation and was assessed by relevant experts as consistent with ordinary human construction. [detiknews]news.detik.comnews Yakin Crop Circle Buatan Manusia, LAPAN Tak Akan Kirim Tim ke Slemannews Yakin Crop Circle Buatan Manusia, LAPAN Tak Akan Kirim Tim ke Sleman

This three-part split is the safest way to read Indonesian UFO material. It lets the interesting cases remain interesting without converting every unresolved light into a spacecraft.

BETA-UFO and the civilian archive problem

BETA-UFO is Indonesia’s most visible civilian UFO community. VICE reported that the group was formed in 1997 and that its work shifted towards networking Indonesian UFO hunters through internet forums. The same report presents BETA-UFO as a community influenced by Salatun, drawing members from varied backgrounds and keeping contact with overseas UFO observers. [VICE]vice.comBertemu Para Pemburu UFO di IndonesiaBertemu Para Pemburu UFO di Indonesia

The strength of BETA-UFO is preservation. Without groups like it, many Indonesian sightings would disappear into old newspapers, broken web pages, local memory, and social-media fragments. It has helped keep cases such as Mount Agung, Cilamaya, Tarakan, Probolinggo, Salatiga, and Pekanbaru visible to later readers. That is valuable, especially in a country where national UFO material is not centrally archived in a public official repository. [Wikipedia]WikipediaJacob SalatunJacob Salatun

The weakness is that civilian UFO archives mix different evidence levels. A photograph, a newspaper clipping, a witness questionnaire, a rumour, a translated foreign case, and a later social-media submission can sit close together. For researchers, that means BETA-UFO should be treated as a lead-generating archive, not as final adjudication. The archive can tell readers what Indonesians reported and how the stories circulated; it cannot by itself prove what the objects were.

Region-level variation: Java, Bali, eastern Indonesia, and the internet age

Java dominates the accessible Indonesian UFO record because it dominates much of Indonesia’s media, administration, and research infrastructure. Jakarta, Bandung, Yogyakarta, Surabaya, Sleman, Porong, Salatiga, Cilamaya, Bekasi, and Mount Salak all appear in Indonesian UFO chronologies. This does not necessarily mean Java has more anomalous aerial activity; it means Java has more observers connected to newspapers, universities, amateur astronomy networks, and online reporting channels. [Wikipedia]WikipediaBig Sur UFOBig Sur UFO

Bali’s role is different. It appears in part because of tourism and photography: Mount Agung in 1973, later Bali reports, Denpasar in 2000, and Seminyak in 2011. A tourist photograph can travel further than a local oral report because it gives the story a portable object — an image — even when the image itself remains ambiguous. [PERKUMPULAN PENGAMAT BENDA TERBANG ANEH]betaufo.idwisatawan jepang memotret penampakan ufo di gunung agung bali 1973wisatawan jepang memotret penampakan ufo di gunung agung bali 1973

Eastern Indonesia contributes the opposite kind of case: Alor is powerful because of narrative, not because of easy verification. It is remote, dramatic, and tied to local memory and later ufological reconstruction. That makes it one of Indonesia’s most culturally important UFO stories, but also one of the hardest to assess with modern evidential standards. [dokumen.pub]dokumen.pubindonesian ufo contact cases database version 09 draft raw english translationindonesian ufo contact cases database version 09 draft raw english translation

The internet age has widened participation but lowered the average evidential quality. Mobile-phone cameras and social media produce more reports, but the typical record is a short clip, a light in the sky, or a compressed image stripped of useful context. In Indonesia, as elsewhere, the rise of drones, lanterns, balloons, satellites, aircraft lights, and atmospheric optics means recent reports often need more sceptical screening, not less.

Official records and what is missing

The biggest gap in Indonesia’s UFO record is not public interest; it is official documentation. There is no obvious public Indonesian equivalent of a large declassified UAP archive with military case files, sensor logs, pilot statements, and technical assessments. LAPAN had aerospace authority and some scientists commented on UFO-adjacent claims, but the clearest accessible official-style intervention is sceptical: the 2011 crop-circle response. [detiknews]news.detik.comnews Yakin Crop Circle Buatan Manusia, LAPAN Tak Akan Kirim Tim ke Slemannews Yakin Crop Circle Buatan Manusia, LAPAN Tak Akan Kirim Tim ke Sleman

Institutionally, the old LAPAN landscape has changed. UN-SPIDER notes that LAPAN merged with other Indonesian research bodies under BRIN in September 2021, and that BRIN remains a regulator in space activities. That matters because modern readers may search for a current “LAPAN UFO office” and find a confusing institutional trail. The current Indonesian space-research environment is about satellites, remote sensing, space policy, and aeronautics, not public UFO case adjudication. [UN-SPIDER]un-spider.orgNational Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN) | UN-SPIDER Knowledge PortalNational Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN) | UN-SPIDER Knowledge Portal

For Indonesia, the most realistic archival path is therefore mixed-source research: old newspapers, Salatun publications, BETA-UFO material, local press, astronomy institutions, military history context, and modern scientific explanations. The absence of a public official archive does not mean every claim is false. It means the claims must be held at lower confidence unless independent records emerge.

Indonesia’s UFO culture is now partly science outreach, partly folklore, partly fandom

Indonesia’s UFO scene is no longer only about sightings. It has become a cultural space where astronomy, art, science fiction, local mystery, and public curiosity overlap. The Associated Press reported that Indonesia’s UFO Festival in Yogyakarta has run since 2016 and brings together enthusiasts interested in space science, UAP, and the search for extraterrestrial intelligence. The 2025 event included an Alien Village, UFO Village, UFO Camp, a Mars exploration module, art galleries, and workshops for adults and students. [AP News]apnews.comSource details in endnotes.

That contemporary scene changes how older cases are interpreted. For some readers, UFOs are evidence claims. For others, they are a doorway into astronomy, speculative technology, creativity, or community. Indonesia’s UFO culture therefore sits between investigation and imagination. A sober page on Indonesian UFOs should not mock that culture, but it also should not confuse cultural vitality with evidential strength.

This is where Indonesia connects naturally to sibling country pages in a wider UFO project. Compared with countries whose UFO histories are heavily shaped by military declassification, Indonesia’s record is more community-preserved. Compared with countries dominated by one famous crash or landing legend, Indonesia’s record is more dispersed: a chain of regional sightings, photographs, crop-circle stories, and local research networks rather than one single national case.

What would raise or lower confidence in Indonesian UFO claims

The next major improvement in Indonesian UFO research would not be another viral video. It would be better evidence handling. The following would materially raise confidence in any Indonesian case:

The same standards would reduce confidence when they are absent. Many Indonesian UFO stories are interesting precisely because they sit in the middle: too persistent to ignore as cultural artefacts, but too thin to treat as proof of extraordinary technology. Alor, Surabaya, Mount Agung, and Cilamaya belong in that middle zone. The Sleman crop circle belongs closer to the explained end. BETA-UFO’s archive belongs in a separate category: an important repository of claims, not a final authority on their causes.

The balanced takeaway on UFOs in Indonesia

Indonesia’s UFO history is real as a history of reports, communities, photographs, disputed cases, and public imagination. It is weak as a proof record for extraterrestrial visitation. Its best-known material comes from a mixture of Salatun’s legacy, BETA-UFO’s civilian archiving, local and national journalism, and highly uneven witness accounts. The strongest conclusion is not that Indonesia has no UFO phenomenon; it is that the Indonesian record shows how unidentified aerial claims become meaningful before they become proven.

That makes Indonesia a valuable branch in any country-by-country UFO project. It illustrates a version of the phenomenon shaped less by official disclosure and more by archipelago geography, local media, amateur investigators, aerospace personalities, and cultural creativity. The serious reader should keep two ideas together: Indonesia has a long and distinctive UFO tradition, and most of its famous cases remain unconfirmed, contested, or explainable with ordinary mechanisms once the available evidence is weighed carefully.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to What Indonesia's UFO Record Really Shows. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

The UFO Experience

By Joseph Allen Hynek

Useful for interpreting mixed-quality sighting reports.

See on Amazon

Book

In Plain Sight

By Ross Coulthart

Connects local reports to wider global UAP discussions.

See on Amazon

Book

UFOs

By Leslie Kean

Provides a strong framework for evaluating national UFO records.

See on Amazon

Book

Passport to Magonia

By Jacques Vallee

Relevant to folklore, culture, and interpretation of reports.

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon: The UFO Experience In Plain Sight UFOs

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Endnotes

1. Source: dokumen.pub
   Link: https://dokumen.pub/alor-incident-60-years-of-unknown-1959-2019-indonesia-ufo-network-978-602-71493-5-9.html
   Source snippet

   978-602-71493-5-9 - DOKUMEN.PUB...

2. Source: Wikipedia
   Title: UFO sightings in Indonesia
   Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_sightings_in_Indonesia

3. Source: betaufo.id
   Title: wisatawan jepang memotret penampakan ufo di gunung agung bali 1973
   Link: https://betaufo.id/wisatawan-jepang-memotret-penampakan-ufo-di-gunung-agung-bali-1973/

4. Source: vice.com
   Title: Bertemu Para Pemburu UFO di Indonesia
   Link: https://www.vice.com/id/article/bertemu-para-pemburu-ufo-di-indonesia/

5. Source: commons.wikimedia.org
   Title: Commons File:Menjingkap Rahasia Piring Terbang.pdf
   Link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AMenjingkap_Rahasia_Piring_Terbang.pdf

6. Source: un-spider.org
   Title: National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN) | UN-SPIDER Knowledge Portal
   Link: https://www.un-spider.org/network/regional-support-offices/national-research-and-innovation-agency-brin

7. Source: Wikipedia
   Title: List of reported UFO sightings
   Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_reported_UFO_sightings

8. Source: news.detik.com
   Title: news Yakin Crop Circle Buatan Manusia, LAPAN Tak Akan Kirim Tim ke Sleman
   Link: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-1552992/yakin-crop-circle-buatan-manusia-lapan-tak-akan-kirim-tim-ke-sleman

9. Source: Wikipedia
   Title: Crop circle
   Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crop_circle

10. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: Lingkaran tanaman
    Link: https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lingkaran_tanaman

11. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: Jacob Salatun
    Link: https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Salatun

12. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: Jacob Salatun
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Salatun

13. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: Big Sur UFO
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Sur_UFO

14. Source: dokumen.pub
    Title: indonesian ufo contact cases database version 09 draft raw english translation
    Link: https://dokumen.pub/indonesian-ufo-contact-cases-database-version-09-draft-raw-english-translation.html

15. Source: dokumen.pub
    Link: https://dokumen.pub/ufo-uap-in-defense-and-security-perspective.html

16. Source: jhmovie.fandom.com
    Title: Unidentified flying object
    Link: https://jhmovie.fandom.com/wiki/Unidentified_flying_object

17. Source: obscurban-legend.fandom.com
    Title: Alor Island Humanoids
    Link: https://obscurban-legend.fandom.com/wiki/Alor_Island_Humanoids

18. Source: disclosure.org
    Title: nsa top secret umbra uap foia release
    Link: https://disclosure.org/news/nsa-top-secret-umbra-uap-foia-release

19. Source: archives.gov
    Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps

20. Source: history.state.gov
    Link: https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1964-68v26/d163

21. Source: en.antaranews.com
    Title: ufo related crop circle found in yogyakarta rice field
    Link: https://en.antaranews.com/news/67268/ufo-related-crop-circle-found-in-yogyakarta-rice-field

22. Source: apnews.com
    Link: https://apnews.com/article/350b16a9ce92683297619c62164beaeb

23. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/617328327480084/posts/842000311679550/

24. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/525166652709431/posts/1115844640308293/

25. Source: x.com
    Link: https://x.com/kabarufo/status/1037262230180392960

26. Source: ufoconnect.com
    Link: https://ufoconnect.com/journalist-profile/jacob-salatun/

27. Source: slideshare.net
    Title: ufo phenomenon
    Link: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/ufo-phenomenon/78402225

Additional References

1. Source: youtube.com
   Title: UFO CRASH IN INDONESIA? FACTS, CONSPIRACY, AND THE EXPOSURE!
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zMNAEearho
   Source snippet

   Mysterious Object Crashed in the Jabun Region Over Indonesia. | Berita Indonesia hari ini| The thaat...

2. Source: youtube.com
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhrH0KzKft4
   Source snippet

   TJP Documentaries: Indonesia's UFO Believers Never Stop Looking...

3. Source: youtube.com
   Title: TJP Documentaries: Indonesia’s UFO Believers Never Stop Looking
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNB5bNlDVWE
   Source snippet

   UFO CRASH IN INDONESIA? FACTS, CONSPIRACY, AND THE EXPOSURE...

4. Source: youtube.com
   Title: I Went Hunting for Aliens in Indonesia (UFOMO)
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rt4kPu582a0
   Source snippet

   'I was intimidated, I had surveillance, I had threats': U.S. Marine who saw craft...

5. Source: war.gov
   Title: department of war releases unidentified anomalous phenomena files in historic t
   Link: https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4480582/department-of-war-releases-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-files-in-historic-t/

6. Source: researchgate.net
   Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259844289_Development_of_Micro-satellite_Technology_at_the_Indonesian_National_Institute_of_Aeronautics_and_Space_LAPAN

7. Source: x.com
   Link: https://x.com/JukiHoki/status/2031197149879480591

8. Source: instagram.com
   Link: https://www.instagram.com/p/DXLA1Vekbdl/?hl=en

9. Source: instagram.com
   Link: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DP-DhWsid3X/

10. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/iapitb/posts/kalian-mungkin-tak-banyak-tahu-kalau-indonesia-memiliki-bapak-ufo-yang-bernama-j/3753754818044471/